DMX vs ArtNet vs sACN: Which Protocol to Choose for Your Installation?

2 Minute Read

🔦  Lighting today is far more than just lamps—it encompasses complex digital systems. To control lighting fixtures, various communication protocols are employed. Using Sundrax equipment as a reference, we will examine three popular options: DMX512, ArtNet, and sACN. Each protocol has distinct features, advantages, and limitations. Which is best suited for your project? Let’s explore with a Sundrax engineer.

Comparison chart of DMX, ArtNet, and sACN protocols for lighting
DMX512 lighting console controlling stage lights in a theater

DMX512 — The Classic Lighting Control

Advantages
  • Simple and reliable
  • Supported by nearly all lighting fixtures
  • Ideal for small to medium installations 
Disadvantages
  • Limited to one universe (512 channels)
  • Challenging to scale
  • Lacks bidirectional communication (without RDM) 
When to use
  • 🎭 Theaters, small stages, and architectural objects with a limited number of fixtures
Close-up of Ethernet cables used in ArtNet lighting systems

ArtNet — DMX over Ethernet

🎛️  ArtNet enables the transmission of DMX data over IP networks. It is designed for large-scale projects where standard DMX falls short. 

Advantages
  • Supports multiple DMX universes through a single cable
  • Widely supported by software and lighting consoles
  • Leverages standard network infrastructure 
Disadvantages
  • Uses UDP, which does not guarantee packet delivery in unreliable networks
  • Requires configuration of IP networks and routing 
When to use
  • 🌇 Architectural installations, media facades, and shows with numerous fixtures
Multicast network setup for sACN in a large exhibition complex

sACN (Streaming ACN) — A More Reliable Alternative

⚡ sACN is a modern protocol for transmitting DMX data over networks, developed by ANSI and ESTA. It is supported by most contemporary devices. 

Advantages
  • Supports up to 63,999 universes
  • Offers multicast and redundancy
  • Ensures reliable data delivery (unlike ArtNet)
  • Conforms to the official ANSI E1.31 standard 
Disadvantages
  • Requires compatible equipment and a well-designed network architecture 
When to use
  • 👷 Large installations where stability and scalability are critical, such as arenas, concert halls, and exhibition complexes

Protocol Selection: Recommendations

📌 DMX512 – recommended for simple installations with up to 512 channels.

📌 ArtNet – suitable for setups with many fixtures and a basic network.

📌 sACN – ideal for critical systems requiring high reliability.

Opinion of the Sundrax Engineer

✨ For small projects, DMX remains an excellent choice. However, for facades with hundreds of fixtures or large-scale stage productions, ArtNet or sACN provide greater flexibility. Plan your network architecture carefully and ensure redundancy.

If you’re uncertain about which protocol best suits your needs, Sundrax engineers are available to design an optimal system.

Contact a technical specialist: WhatsApp


 

Entertainment Lighting catalogs

Sundrax Entertainment Lighting Catalogs